The study analyzes how the Russia-Ukraine war has altered global energy price dynamics, focusing on shifts across three key periods: pre-pandemic, during the pandemic, and the combined effects of both the pandemic and war. By examining these phases, the study reveals significant changes in how different energy prices interact, particularly highlighting a decline in the correlation between crude oil and refined products following the outbreak of the war.
One of the key findings is that the war produced a sharp but mostly short-lived decoupling of the historical price relationships within energy markets. While crude oil and refined products, such as diesel, previously moved in close alignment, their co-movement weakened significantly post-invasion. European diesel prices were particularly affected, experiencing more volatility compared to their U.S. counterparts. This divergence suggests that the war had a more profound impact on the European energy market, where supply chain disruptions and shifting trade routes played a greater role in reshaping price structures.
Importantly, this decoupling did not play out uniformly across all fuels. Gasoline showed only slight evidence of contagion from Brent crude, and cross-correlations between natural gas and Brent remained weak and largely unchanged throughout.
Beyond immediate price changes, the study shows the structural transformation of global energy markets, though one characterized by a pronounced peak detachment with a bounceback rather than a uniform permanent change. The sanctions on Russian energy exports and the resulting shifts in trade patterns may have introduced new complexities, with long-term consequences for energy pricing and market stability, though the channels of the effect are not tested empirically.
The study concludes that, although energy markets have historically shown strong co-movements between crude oil and its derivatives, the war introduced a temporary shift in these relationships. As geopolitical instability persists, energy prices may remain prone to sudden dislocations, but traditional correlation patterns have at least partially reasserted themselves. The research underscores the need for policymakers and market participants to recognize that price correlations can change sharply in the wake of large shocks.
Read the full article.
