The effectiveness of energy sanctions against Russia remains a subject of debate, with concerns over both their economic impact and their strategic design. This study examines how different approaches to sanctioning Russian energy exports influence not only Russia’s economy but also the global market. The central argument is that sanctioning energy exports requires a phased and adaptive approach rather than an immediate and uniform embargo.
The study distinguishes between two approaches: voluntary, country-specific restrictions, where nations independently decide their level of sanctions, and a more coordinated, universally enforced framework aimed at eliminating Russian energy from global markets. In the early stages, a decentralized system allows countries to adjust their policies without triggering extreme shocks in global energy prices. As Russia’s share of global exports diminishes, the study argues that a stricter, more coordinated strategy becomes feasible, allowing for a more effective containment of Russian revenues without destabilizing sanctioning economies.
Despite sanctions already reducing demand for Russian energy, the study emphasizes the need for a gradual yet firm escalation (as of April 2022). A sudden, absolute ban would likely send oil prices soaring, benefiting Russia in the short term, while a measured transition allows for a more sustainable squeeze on its economic capacity. Maintaining pressure on Russian energy revenues while avoiding collateral damage to sanctioning countries is presented as the key challenge, requiring continuous adaptation of policies as market conditions evolve.
The study suggests that sanctions should not remain static but should be adjusted in response to changing global energy dynamics. By managing the pace and intensity of restrictions, policymakers can maximize economic pressure on Russia while minimizing self-inflicted harm, ensuring that the objectives of sanctions are met without destabilizing the economies enforcing them.
Read the full article.
